Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 14
Attendant Kuo Serves Tea
The Book of Serenity
Banshō's pointer
The probing pole is in hand; shadow grass accompanies the body. At times there is iron wrapped in a ball of cotton; at times a great stone wrapped in brocade. Using hardness to decide softness is of course the usual thing. What about becoming weak upon meeting strength?
Case
Attendant Kuo asked Tokusan, “Where have all the sages from antiquity gone?” Tokusan said, “What? What?” Kuo said, “An imperial order calls for a flying-dragon horse, but a lame turtle sticks out its head.” Tokusan then stopped and left. The next day, when Tokusan emerged from bathing, Kuo served him tea. Tokusan stroked Kuo's back once. Kuo said, “This old fellow has only now caught a glimpse.” Tokusan again stopped and left.
Hongzhi's verse
When it comes face to face, the adept knows. Even sparks from flint and lightning would be slow. The strategist who yields the mechanism has a deep intention. A military man who deceives the enemy lacks long foresight. When he releases, he must hit. Whom could he deceive further? With cheeks visible from behind his head, he is difficult to affront. With an eye placed beneath his brows, he gained the advantage.
Footnotes 3
- The black dragon and its pearl are inherited mythic imagery for extreme risk and rare attainment, not zoological description. ↩
- The scatological Gantō anecdote exemplifies abrasive Zen rhetoric about surpassing one's teacher. It is preserved without treating verbal aggression as a general pedagogical norm. ↩
- The seven women's charnel-ground awakening and divine flower offering are Buddhist religious narrative, translated as Banshō's received precedent rather than independently verified history. ↩
About this version and its sources
- Full source citation
- Source title: 廓侍過茶. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0235c17–p0236a27. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
- Method
- Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
- Editorial uncertainty
- Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
- Rights
- Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
- Revision identifier
- 8236637df2d4
Banshō's commentary on the case
Ordinarily Tokusan struck wind and beat rain, berated buddhas and cursed ancestors. This monk's offense covered the sky; why did Tokusan let him pass? Little did they know: felling an ox requires no rope, killing a person requires no knife. When had he ever let him pass? Old Huanglong said, “Tokusan played deaf and acted mute. Though he secretly gained an advantage, Master Kuo covered his ears while stealing a bell—what can he do about looking ugly to bystanders?” Banshō says: it was more than stealing a bell. It was like descending to the ninth level of an abyss and prying a pearl from beneath the black dragon's jaw just as the dragon slept. If it awakened, he would certainly be minced to paste.3 Zhe of Dawei said, “Unless one climbs Dragon Gate, how can one know the blue sea's breadth? Even if waves strike a thousand fathoms high, what can be done when the dragon king pays no attention?” Banshō says: a fine scale or fragment of armor is not enough to wonder at. Foguo said, “Tokusan truly had rough hands and feet. He saw that this monk was not a person who would submit to drill and hammer, and therefore stopped.” Banshō says: when the ancients encountered things and met the occasion, each had adaptive means. Tokusan told Gantō, “Later you will defecate on this old monk's head.” Later Gantō indeed said, “Great Tokusan did not understand the final phrase.”4 How could the ancients' pressing down and raising up, releasing and taking away, be confined by gain and loss, victory and defeat? Huanglong and Dawei raised only the broad outline. Look further at Tendō versifying the deep details. “Where have all the sages from antiquity gone?” This greatly resembles passing them by face to face. Tokusan said, “What? What?” Hiding his body in shadow grass, Tokusan brought out a mirror that dazzles the eyes. Long ago seven worthy women wandered in Sitavana, the charnel forest. One woman said, “The corpse is here; where is the person?” Another said, “What? What?” The women looked at one another and all awakened to the Way. In response, the Lord of Heaven scattered flowers in offering.5 Tokusan used this one mechanism to borrow a road and pass through. You must not understand it simply in that way. Thus the verse says, “Even sparks from flint and lightning would be slow.” How could Tokusan not know that the attendant would not let him pass? He set a lure to seek the pigeon, investing capital in pursuit of profit. Sure enough, he could not escape Kuo's shooting range. If someone suddenly asked Banshō, “Where have they gone?” I would slap him across the cheek and say, “Here.” I would directly make the flying-dragon horse and lame turtle draw in their necks and bunch their hooves; attendant and Tokusan would lose their points and become tongue-tied. Do you still recognize old Tokusan? In youth he once decided formations of dragons and snakes; worn out in age, he still listens to a child's song.