Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 37
Isan's Karmic Consciousness
The Book of Serenity
Banshō's pointer
Drive away the plowman's ox and drag back its nostrils. Snatch a hungry person's food and grip the throat. Is there anyone who can bring down such a severe hand?
Case
Isan asked Kyōzan, “Suppose someone asks: ‘All sentient beings possess only karmic consciousness, vast and obscure, with no root on which to rely.’ How would you test this?” Kyōzan said, “If a monk came, I would immediately call, ‘So-and-so!’ “When the monk turned his head, “I would ask, ‘What is it?’ “I would wait for him to deliberate. “Then I would tell him, ‘Not only is karmic consciousness vast and obscure; it also has no root on which to rely.’” Isan said, “Excellent!”
Wanshi's verse
At one call you turn your head—do you recognize me? Dimly, the moon among vines again becomes a hook. The child worth a thousand gold has only just fallen into wandering. Desolate at the road's end—how much sorrow there is.
Footnotes 5
- Banshō refuses a simple division in which the quick response is wisdom and later hesitation ignorance. His reversal places child, monk, and teachers within the same nondual problem without erasing their different roles. ↩
- The child is called, pointed to, questioned, labeled, and then leaves. The text reports bewilderment as perceived by the adult teacher, not the child's own account of the event. ↩
- Wang Anshi's claim that Seppō's phrase helped make him chief minister is a literary report linking Zen recognition and political career; it does not establish causation. ↩
- Banshō explicitly weighs two readings: a moon viewed through gauze and a moon amid vines. He prefers 蘿, “vine,” through Li Bai's line, while preserving the doctrinal usefulness of the alternative. ↩
- The commoner/chief-minister and hereditary-official contrast draws on elite status assumptions. Dongshan's reply reframes apparent advancement as recovery from temporary decline; the social hierarchy is historical rhetoric, not an endorsed measure of human worth. ↩
About this version and its sources
- Full source citation
- Source title: 溈山業識. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0252a03–p0252b27. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
- Method
- Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
- Editorial uncertainty
- Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
- Rights
- Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
- Revision identifier
- 7ca8c3939921
Banshō's commentary on the case
A monk asked Yun'an, “The Huayan Treatise takes the affliction of abiding ignorance itself to be the unmoving wisdom of all buddhas. Its principle is extremely deep and subtle, altogether difficult to understand.” Yun'an said, “This is most evident and easy to understand.” At the time a child was sweeping. Yun'an called, and the child turned his head. Yun'an pointed and said, “Is this not unmoving wisdom?” Kyōzan's calling the monk and the monk's turning were precisely this moment. Yun'an then asked the child, “What is your buddha-nature?” The child looked left and right, bewildered, and left. Yun'an said, “Is this not the affliction of abiding ignorance? If you can understand it, you become buddha right now.”2 The child's bewilderment is no different from deliberation. The affliction of abiding ignorance is likewise the same as karmic consciousness, vast and obscure. Yun'an and Kyōzan test monks and examine people with such precise aim. Banshō's seeing is different: through and through, both child and monk are unmoving wisdom; from the beginning, Yun'an and Kyōzan are karmic consciousness, vast and obscure.1 If a person can distinguish this, that person sees Tendō directly. Hyakujō ascended the hall. Just as the assembly gathered, he drove them all down at once with his staff. Then he called, “Assembly!” They turned their heads. Hyakujō said, “What is it?” Communities everywhere call this Hyakujō's “descending-the-hall phrase.” It too rewards close investigation. Lord Jing, Wang Anshi, said, “I obtained one phrase from Seppō and became chief minister.” People repeatedly asked him for instruction. He said, “That old fellow was always saying to people, ‘What is it?’”3 Wanshi's first line versifies calling the monk, his turning, and “What is it?” In 識我不, the graph 不 is read fou, meaning “not”; the sense is “Do you recognize me or not?” Kyōzan uses a hand without semantic meaning to strike a house off guard. If the monk had glimpsed it in the light of a spark from stone, this could be called recognizing the emperor in a bustling market. If instead he fails to come through deliberation, dimly the moon among vines again becomes a hook. Ōbaku ascended the hall. Just as the assembly gathered, he drove them all down at once with his staff. Then he called, “Assembly!” They turned their heads. Ōbaku said, “The moon resembles a bent bow: little rain, much wind.” The verse uses the sense of this. Shishishan asked Kyōzan while they watched the moon, “When the moon is pointed, where does its round appearance go? When it is round, where does its pointed appearance go?” Shishi said, “When pointed, the round appearance is hidden. When round, the pointed appearance remains.” Ungan said, “When pointed, the round appearance remains. When round, the pointed appearance is absent.” Dōgo said, “When pointed, it is not pointed; when round, it is not round.” “Becomes a hook” is the pointed appearance. Luo Binwang's poem says, “Since it can be round like a mirror, why need it bend like a hook?” The Huayan school calls this “the gate in which hidden and manifest are both accomplished.” Buddhist teaching also says that bodhisattvas of the tenth stage see nature as though viewing the moon through gauze. The phrase might therefore be read “gauze-moon.” Yet Li Bai's poem says, “The vine-moon hangs as a morning mirror; pine wind sounds the night strings.” The graph “vine” carries the fuller meaning here.4 Tendō uses a hazy new moon partly hidden in smoky vines. Though it is not round and bright, its horn already shows. This versifies the monk's half-light, half-dark place, as if present and as if absent. Banshō greatly resembles a salt-and-iron judge. Tendō's needlework is deep and fine: if the thread were not kept unbroken, the brocade pattern could hardly be completed. Senior Mi was walking with Dongshan when they saw a white rabbit pass. Mi said, “How excellent!” Dongshan asked, “How so?” Mi said, “Like a commoner appointed chief minister.” Dongshan said, “At your great age, you make such a statement?” Mi asked, “What would you say?” Dongshan said, “For generations wearing official hairpins and tassels, he has temporarily fallen into decline.”5 Sima Xiangru's “Rhapsody on the Imperial Park” says, “A child worth a thousand gold does not sit beneath the edge of the hall.” Ruan Ji habitually rode in a rough cart; whenever he met a road's end, he wept bitterly and turned back. Banshō says: if one can take the road home, one can turn the body and return to the father. Have you not heard, “Turn illumination back in one thought and at once equal original attainment”? If so, why does the unmoving wisdom of all buddhas, upon reaching the portion of all sentient beings, come to be called karmic consciousness, vast and obscure? Had you known earlier that the lamp was fire, the rice would have been cooked long ago.