Site Under Construction
Koan CommonsKoan collections

Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 47

Jōshū's Cypress Tree

The Book of Serenity

Edition
Names

Names without a verified counterpart remain in their source form.

Banshō's pointer

The cypress before the courtyard; the wind-banner atop the pole. It is like one flower speaking boundless spring, one drop speaking the water of the great sea. An ancient buddha born at rare intervals, far beyond the ordinary current, does not fall into language or thought. How can you discuss it and understand?

Case

A monk asked Jōshū, “What is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the West?” Jōshū said, “The cypress tree before the courtyard.”

Wanshi's verse

Bank-like brows crossed with snow— river eyes containing autumn. Sea-mouth drums waves; ship-tongue rides the current. The hand that settles disorder— the strategy for peace. Old Jōshū, old Jōshū! Stirring and stirring the communities, in the end not stopping. Vainly expending effort, he builds a cart matching the wheel-ruts. Originally without any trick, he fills valleys and blocks ditches.

Banshō's commentary on the case

One day Jōshū ascended the hall and said, “This matter is perfectly clear. Even an immeasurably great person cannot get out of here. “When this old monk went to Isan, a monk asked, ‘What is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the West?’ Isan said, ‘Bring me the stool.’ If one is a teacher of the lineage, one must receive people with the matter of one's own portion.” A monk then asked Jōshū, “What is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the West?” Jōshū said, “The cypress tree before the courtyard.” The monk said, “Reverend, do not use an object to show people.” Jōshū said, “I do not use an object to show people.” The monk said, “Then what is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the West?” Jōshū said, “The cypress tree before the courtyard.”1 Zen Master Huijue of Guangxiao Monastery east of Yangzhou city went to Hōgen. Hōgen asked, “Where have you recently come from?” Huijue said, “Jōshū.” Hōgen said, “I have heard that Jōshū had the saying about the cypress tree. Is that so?” Huijue said, “No.” Hōgen said, “Travelers everywhere all say that a monk asked, ‘What is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the West?’ and Jōshū said, ‘The cypress tree before the courtyard.’ How can you say there was no such saying?” Huijue said, “My late teacher truly never said this. Reverend, please do not slander my late teacher.”2 Everywhere Huijue was called “Iron-Beak Jue.” Reverend Shengmo required people first to pass through this story and wash away their knowing and views. He once said, “The three mysteries and five ranks are all within it.” Zen Master Fang of Zhenru awakened through this story and went straight into the abbot's quarters to see Zen Master Jue, Guangzhao of Rōya. Guangzhao asked, “How do you understand it?” Zhenru said, “Last night the bedding was warm; one sleep lasted until dawn.” Guangzhao approved him. Zhenru's awakening to this story was excellent. Tendō's verse on it is also not bad.3 Seven hundred sexagenary cycles—he had experienced many affairs. Thus bank-like brows are crossed with snow. The ancients used brows and eyes as cliff and lightning. Tendō uses the old “river eyes, sea mouth” expressions to make a four-line verse, as though one saw the living Jōshū pointing to the cypress. Brows like a bank of reed flowers; eyes blue as autumn water. An old line says: Wild water clearer than a monk's eyes, blue; distant mountains dense as a buddha's head, dark green. “Sea-mouth drums waves; ship-tongue rides the current.” Waves can overturn a ship; a ship can ride the waves. One word can cause a state to flourish; one word can cause a state to perish. Therefore Wanshi follows with “the hand that settles disorder, the strategy for peace.” This is political efficacy rhetoric, not a claim that Zen speech should govern states.4 Jōshū once said, “Sometimes I take one blade of grass and use it as a sixteen-foot golden body. Sometimes I take a sixteen-foot golden body and use it as one blade of grass.” This cypress story originally resolved people's doubts. Yet today, how many people doubt because of it? Did Jōshū intend to stir up the communities? People see that when Jōshū was asked, he answered immediately, as though without relying on effort. Tendō alone knew Jōshū's saying: “Eighty years traveling on foot; a three-year-old child surpasses me, and I learn from the child.” This is constructed in leisure and used in urgency. A person who has not undergone bitter effort does not know.5 Wolun said: Wolun has a skill: he can sever a hundred thoughts. Facing objects, mind does not arise; awakening grows day after day. The Sixth Ancestor said: Huineng has no skill: he does not sever a hundred thoughts. Facing objects, mental events repeatedly arise; how could awakening grow?6 Seen this way, what about the affair of filling valleys and blocking ditches? Today it is thrown into West Lake. Loaded with the pure wind, to whom will it be entrusted?

Footnotes 6
  1. Jōshū agrees that he is not using an external object to show the monk, then repeats “the cypress.” This blocks both representational symbolism and dismissal of the concrete words. ↩
  2. Huijue's denial is preserved by Banshō inside the case commentary. It does not prove which account is historically correct, but it makes confident attribution to Jōshū textually contestable. ↩
  3. “Awakened” and “approved” are judgments transmitted within the lineage record. The bedding line indicates uncontrived rest, but it cannot independently establish the historical practitioner's internal state. ↩
  4. State-order metaphors magnify the consequence of speech in a monarchic political vocabulary. They do not make political domination a model for religious authority. ↩
  5. Banshō interprets Jōshū's immediate answer as the usable result of long travel and bitter work. Spontaneity here is trained responsiveness, not proof that cultivation is unnecessary. ↩
  6. Wolun's controlled cessation and Huineng's “no skill” are deliberately opposed. Huineng's reply criticizes reifying thought suppression as growing awakening; it does not celebrate compulsive or harmful thinking. ↩
About this version and its sources
Full source citation
Source title: 趙州柏樹. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0256c13–p0257a29. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
Method
Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
Editorial uncertainty
Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
Rights
Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
Revision identifier
d3ac47b9ac01