Site Under Construction
Koan CommonsKoan collections

Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 71

Suigan's Eyebrows

The Book of Serenity

Edition
Names

Names without a verified counterpart remain in their source form.

Banshō's pointer

Hold blood in your mouth and spit it at someone: you soil your own mouth. Covet the cup, and for a lifetime repay another's debt; sell paper for three years, and still owe money to ghosts.3 Banshō seeks instruction on behalf of you all: is there anyone who has a way to shoulder the burden?

Case

At the end of the summer retreat, Suigan instructed the assembly: “All summer long I have spoken for you brothers. “Look—are Suigan's eyebrows still there?” Hofuku said, “A thief's heart is uneasy.” Changqing said, “They have grown!” Unmon said, “Barrier!”

Hongzhi's verse

A thief's heart— courage surpassing others. Distinct in every direction, he meets the occasion's response. Hofuku and Unmon lower noses past lips. Suigan and Changqing let long brows shade their eyes. How many fabricated Zen fellows are there? They insist that meaning and phrase are cleared away together. Burying themselves, they hold their breath and swallow their voices. Implicating the ancestral house, they face a wall carrying a board.

Banshō's commentary on the case

Great Master Yongming of Suigan in Mingzhou, personal name Lingcan, was a native of Huzhou. He received Seppō's prediction and opened a great teaching seat. One day he ascended the hall and said, “All summer long I have spoken east and west for you brothers. Look—are Suigan's eyebrows still there?” Many throughout the various regions say, “He originally meant to surrender himself, but without realizing it doubled the case.” Then they see Hofuku say, “A thief's heart is uneasy,” and claim that Suigan has been gathering firewood behind his back, concealing his verbal offense himself. Foguo said, “Many people misunderstand, saying, ‘In broad daylight under a clear sky, he spoke words with no direction or relevance, making trouble where there was none. He first confessed his own fault so others would not inspect him.’ Fortunately, this has nothing to do with it.” Changqing said, “They have grown!” Banshō says: They remain right above his eyes. Unmon's word “Barrier!” belongs to what Puzhao called “one-word Zen.” All three succeeded Seppō. They heard a person of the house speak no outsider's words; they saw that Suigan's instruction was extraordinary, and therefore all joined in the responsive singing. The ancients' replies did not fall into conventional gestures.4 A doctrinal lecturer attached to a Huayan lecture seat invited Suigan to a vegetarian meal. Suigan said, “This mountain monk has a question. If you can answer, I will attend the meal.” He then picked up a flatbread and asked, “Does this possess the dharma body?” The lecturer said, “It does.” Suigan said, “Then one eats the dharma body.” The lecturer had no answer. A contemporary lecturer answered on his behalf, “What fault is there in that?” Suigan did not approve. Unmon answered on his behalf, “I especially thank the venerable for condescending to dignify this empty feast.”5 Juefan called Great Master Unmon a king among monks. Sure enough, Tendō strings them together in a single strand and versifies the whole encounter from its beginning. Setchō said, “When one steals skillfully, ghosts and spirits do not know.” Since Hofuku and Tendō saw through him, Suigan would seem not to be a skilled hand. What they fail to realize is that great Unmon and Changqing were both caught at once when Suigan used a single eyebrow hair to pierce their nostrils. If one hides one's head but shows one's shadow, how could one count as an outstandingly formidable person? Suigan could therefore move distinctly in every direction, meeting the occasion and responding to its stimulus. Hofuku's “A thief's heart is uneasy” and Unmon's “Barrier!” both show the long nostrils of patch-robed monks: A thousand li away, already smelling dried shit; through three winter months, still scenting rotten-melon fragrance. Suigan said, “Are my eyebrows still there?” Changqing immediately said, “They have grown!” This is the moment when the eminent monk painted on a wall answers as soon as he is called, when the goose raised in a bottle has already emerged by following the sound. How could discriminating consciousness calculate it?6 Therefore the verse says long brows shade the eyes: he watches people from a cool place, and they cannot deceive him by a single speck. Some say, “All summer long the tangled vines put out branches and trailing tendrils; now he cuts the grass and removes the roots, clearing everything away together.” They fail to realize that thirty years later this saying would flourish greatly. Why hide it in a bag, cover it with bedding, hold the breath, and swallow the voice? Doing so is facing the wall and carrying a board, and it implicates the ancestral house. Throughout the various regions they say, “Xu Six carries a board and sees only one side.” The Book of Documents says, “If one does not learn, one faces a wall.” Its commentary explains: facing a wall, one sees nothing.7 Do you not see? On Vulture Peak the Buddha emitted the mark of the white curl, illuminating eighteen thousand worlds in the east.8

Footnotes 6
  1. The opening proverbs describe liabilities incurred through aggressive speech and appetite. Their exact textual antecedents and transactional imagery remain uncertain. ↩
  2. “Received Seppō's prediction” and the respondents' spiritual standing are lineage claims. They establish how Banshō frames the exchange, not independently verified inner attainment. ↩
  3. The flatbread exchange tests whether doctrinal predicates survive ordinary eating. Unmon's ceremonious thanks answers the invitation and the alleged dharma-body meal at once. ↩
  4. Raising a goose in a bottle is a traditional problem: how can it be removed without breaking the bottle or harming the goose? Banshō presents response to a sound as an image of release, not a zoological report. ↩
  5. Carrying a board obstructs one side of one's view; facing a wall obstructs the whole field. Both criticize one-sided interpretation, while the historical attribution of the Xu Six proverb remains uncertain. ↩
  6. The white curl emitting light across thousands of worlds is scriptural Buddhist imagery. It functions here as the opposite of wall-facing blindness, not as a scientifically testable event. ↩
About this version and its sources
Full source citation
Source title: 翠巖眉毛. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0271c29–p0272b16. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
Method
Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
Editorial uncertainty
Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
Rights
Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
Revision identifier
018ccac587bc