Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 98
Tōzan Is Always Intimate
The Book of Serenity
Banshō's pointer
Kyūhō severs his tongue, pursuing and harmonizing with Sekisō. Sōzan chops off the head and does not betray Tōzan Peak. The ancients' three-inch tongues were intimate to such a degree. Now, where is their method for helping people?
Case
A monk asked Tōzan, “Among the three bodies, which body does not fall within the various enumerations?”2 Tōzan said, “I am always intimate with this.”
Hongzhi's verse
Not entering the world— not yet following conditions. At the empty place of the kalpa-vessel, the family transmission exists. Fine wind over white water-ferns; dusk on the autumn river. To the ancient bank the boat returns, through one band of smoke.
Footnotes 6
- The three bodies—dharma body, enjoyment or reward body, and transformation body—are Mahayana interpretive categories. They do not assert that a person literally possesses three independently measurable organisms. ↩
- This Sozan exchange is textually difficult. The English preserves its repeated 切 rather than pretending that the logical relation among assent, acceptance, intimacy, and avoidance is settled. ↩
- Chopping off a head, severing a tongue, and striking a mouth are violent rhetoric and narrated assault. Wordplay does not make actual mutilation or hitting ethical, safe, or necessary. ↩
- “State taboo” invokes prohibitions on an emperor's personal name and the danger of offense. It figures reverent reticence but also carries the coercive power of monarchy. ↩
- “Family transmission” and “descendants” are institutional lineage metaphors. They do not prove historical continuity and should not naturalize inherited authority or exclusion. ↩
- Banshō's discussion belongs to premodern literary botany. Identifying the exact modern species behind 白蘋 requires independent botanical and textual evidence. ↩
About this version and its sources
- Full source citation
- Source title: 洞山常切. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0290c25–p0291b04. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
- Method
- Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
- Editorial uncertainty
- Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
- Rights
- Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
- Revision identifier
- 549ec79e2398
Banshō's commentary on the case
In the original record the question is, “Among the three bodies, which single body expounds the Dharma?” Tōzan says, “I am always intimate with this.” Zen Master Ren of Sozan first asked Tōzan, “Please, teacher, instruct me in the word before there is anything.” Tōzan said, “I do not assent; no one accepts.” Sozan said, “Can one still become intimate?” Tōzan said, “Ācārya, can you become intimate right now?” Sozan said, “If intimacy cannot be attained, there is nowhere to avoid.” Tōzan approved him.3 Later a monk asked Sōzan, “Our late teacher said, ‘I am always intimate with this.’ What was his intent?” Sōzan said, “If you want your head, chop it off and take it away.” The monk also asked Seppō. Seppō struck him across the mouth with his staff and said, “I too once went to Tōzan.”4 Zong of Chengtian said, “One turning word makes the sea calm and the Yellow River clear. One turning word makes the wind high and moon cold. One turning word rides the bandit's horse to pursue the bandit. Please try to distinguish them. “If suddenly a patch-robed monk came forward and said, ‘None is like that,’ I would also allow that he possessed one eye.” Originally, descendants beneath Yakusan offered the matter from the side and guarded the taboo. Fine source texts often agree on this. Have you not heard? A monk asked Sekisō, “What is the ancestral teacher's intent in coming from the west?” Sekisō clenched his teeth and showed them. The monk did not understand. After Sekisō passed away, the monk asked Kyūhō, “What was our late teacher's intent in clenching his teeth?” Kyūhō said, “I would rather cut off my tongue than violate the state's taboo.” The monk also asked Yungai. Yungai said, “What enmity do I have with our late teacher?”5 The venerable Yong of Baoning versified: How painful, this intimacy, when one seeks outside; why does the nearest kin seem like an enemy? From beginning to end, shame never colors his face, and Sōzan further asks you for your head. It is certainly fine—only it violates wind and smoke too greatly. Look at the several kinds of Tendō's fine intimacy. “Not entering the world, not yet following conditions”: if you see the cheeks from behind the head, do not associate with such a person. “At the empty place of the kalpa-vessel, the family transmission exists.” Tōzan sings in this way; Sōzan harmonizes in this way; Seppō finishes it off in this way. The three stages must be urged on by the whole company, for the Yellow River is turbid from its source.6 Zhou Qi's Record of Local Customs distinguishes the names ping, pin, and celery. The larger is pin; the smaller is ping. For “white pin,” a poem by Liu Yun says: On Ting Lake they gather white water-ferns; at sunset, spring in Jiangnan. In the grotto is a guest returning; at Xiaoxiang one meets an old friend. Later people named that place White-Pin Islet. “Fine wind over white water-ferns; dusk on the autumn river” also recalls Song Yu's “Rhapsody on Wind”: Wind is born at the tips of green water-ferns; it gradually enters stream and valley, follows the slopes of Mount Tai, and dances beneath pine and cypress. It is called white pin because its shoots are green and its flowers white.7 I dare ask: to what place does the boat returning to the ancient bank go? Who knows? Beyond the distant smoke and waves is another fine consideration.