Site Under Construction
Koan CommonsKoan collections

Shōyōroku / Congrong lu · CASE 100

Rōya's Mountains and Rivers

The Book of Serenity

Edition
Names

Names without a verified counterpart remain in their source form.

Banshō's pointer

One word can cause a state to flourish; one word can cause a state to perish. This medicine can kill a person; this medicine can also bring a person to life. The benevolent see it and call it benevolence; the wise see it and call it wisdom.3 Now say: where do benefit and harm lie?

Case

A monk asked the venerable Jue of Rōya, “If it is fundamentally so in purity, how did mountains, rivers, and the great earth suddenly arise?”4 Rōya said, “If it is fundamentally so in purity, how did mountains, rivers, and the great earth suddenly arise?”

Hongzhi's verse

See being, yet do not make it being. Turn the palm up; turn the palm down. The person inside Mount Rōya— does not fall behind Gautama.

Banshō's commentary on the case

Zen Master Shanzhao, Wude of Fenyang, lived where the northern country was bitterly cold and therefore discontinued the night interviews. An Indian monk arrived riding a cloud and urged him, “You must not lose the proper time. Though this assembly is not large, six people are great vessels whose Way will shelter humans and gods.”5 The next day Fenyang ascended the hall and said: The foreign monk's golden staff shone; for the Dharma he came to Fenyang. Six people will become great vessels; he urged and requested me to expound it. At the time, Zhi of Dayu, Yuan of Ciming, Jue of Rōya, Ju of Fahua, Tai of Tiansheng, Yong of Shishuang, and others were beneath his mat. Zen Master Huijue, Kaihua Guangzhao of Mount Rōya in Chuzhou, was from western Luoyang. His father served as governor of Hengyang. When his father died, Huijue escorted the coffin back toward Luoyang. Passing through Lizhou, he climbed to Yakusan's ancient monastery to pay reverence. Looking over the places where Yakusan had walked and lived, he felt as though they were a former home. Through this condition he left household life.6 He received the Dharma from Fenyang and responded to conditions beside the Chu River. He proclaimed the Way at the same time as Mingjue of Setchō, and beneath heaven they were called the “two gates of sweet dew.” Even today in Huainan, the transforming influence they left remains as before.7 The venerable Qilin of Hunan, whenever he saw a monk arrive, immediately cried, “A demon comes! A demon comes!” He brandished a wooden sword and slipped into the abbot's quarters. He did this for twelve years. Later he put down the sword and said nothing. A monk asked, “Twelve years ago, why did you subdue demons?” Qilin said, “A thief does not strike the house of a poor child.” The monk asked, “Twelve years later, why do you not subdue demons?” Qilin said, “A thief does not strike the house of a poor child.” This is called the meaning of dividing the body beneath a single sword.8 In fascicle four of the Śūraṅgama, Purna asks: “If all the faculties and their objects in the world—the aggregates, sense-fields, and elements—are all tathāgata treasury, fundamentally so in purity, how did mountains, rivers, the great earth, and all conditioned characteristics suddenly arise, successively flow and change, end, and begin again?”4 An expositor says: If one understands, one already knows that the substance of awakening is originally wondrous, ignorance originally empty, and mountains, rivers, and the great earth like flowers in empty space. If one is deluded, subject and object falsely divide; forced awareness suddenly arises; the three subtle aspects form the world and the four wheels establish the realm.9 Rōya says, “I do not agree. ‘Fundamentally so in purity—how did mountains, rivers, and the great earth suddenly arise?’” This is called riding the bandit's horse to pursue the bandit, seizing the bandit's spear to kill the bandit. Xin of Jianfu said, “The first move does not reach; the last goes too far.” Banshō says: Xu Six carrying a board—each sees only one side. If you wish to eliminate the leakage of views, you must see Tendō. “See being, yet do not make it being”: its being decays of itself. “See the strange, yet do not make it strange”: its strangeness collapses of itself. The Shi Moheyan lun, traditionally said to have been composed by the fourteenth ancestor Nagarjuna, states: Because of all causes and conditions, all phenomena should exist. Because of all causes and conditions, all phenomena should not exist. This is turning the palm up and turning it down.10 Rōya ascended the hall and said: “Seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing are all causes of birth and death. Seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing are all the basis of liberation. “It is like a lion turning and throwing itself back: north, south, east, and west, with no fixed stopping place. “If all of you do not understand, for now do not betray old Shakyamuni. Hng!” This is why he does not fall behind Gautama. “Gautama” is Sanskrit; given in full, Gotama. It is explained here as “Supreme on Earth,” meaning the most excellent among humans on earth, apart from beings in heaven.11 Now, in the later five-hundred-year period, the time of the sage is distant and people are often negligent. How can one avoid falling behind? Split open ancient and present.12

Footnotes 10
  1. The political and medical metaphors are high-stakes: speech can influence states and medicines can harm or heal, but actual policy and treatment require evidence, dosage, context, and accountable expertise. ↩
  2. The received Chinese Śūraṅgama Sūtra has been enormously influential in East Asian Buddhism, while its Indic provenance and composition remain disputed in modern scholarship. The quotation proves this case's dependence on the Chinese text, not an uncontested Sanskrit origin. ↩
  3. A monk riding a cloud is a hagiographic marvel. The cold that prompted Fenyang to cancel night instruction was a real safety consideration; miracle authority should not override risks of exposure, exhaustion, or illness. ↩
  4. Huijue's sense that Yakusan was a former home may express karmic memory within the biography. It is reported experience, not independently verified evidence of a past life. ↩
  5. The biography embeds elite status—his father was a governor—and institutional claims about succession and influence. These may shape access and prestige and require corroboration beyond the lineage record. ↩
  6. Calling visitors “demons,” brandishing even a wooden weapon, and hiding can intimidate or injure. “Demon” here is ritualized Zen language, not a mental-health diagnosis or permission to threaten people. ↩
  7. “Three subtle aspects” and “four wheels” are traditional Buddhist explanatory categories. They are not modern accounts of the formation of matter, planets, mountains, or life. ↩
  8. The Shi Moheyan lun circulated with an attribution to Nagarjuna, but its authorship and place of composition are contested. Banshō's statement records reception history rather than settling provenance. ↩
  9. The gloss of Gautama as “Supreme on Earth” is a traditional Chinese etymology and does not match a straightforward modern Sanskrit derivation. ↩
  10. The “later five hundred years” is a Dharma-decline scheme used to frame urgency. It does not provide an objective chronology of moral or intellectual degeneration. ↩
About this version and its sources
Full source citation
Source title: 瑯琊山河. Base: CBETA T2004, T48n2004_p0291c05–p0292a20. Angle brackets represent inline notes.
Method
Direct critical-edition translation from the cited received base text. Source claims, hagiography, uncertainty, and unresolved readings remain identified in the notes and project record.
Editorial uncertainty
Independent philological and reader review remain pending.
Rights
Project translation © Tulsa Zen Center Critical Edition contributors. Source text is cited by edition; redistribution policy requires final organizational approval.
Revision identifier
14543b6cf948